Research ethics committees in a tight spot: Approving consent strategies for child research that are prima facie illegal but are ethical in terms of national guidelines


Strode AE. et al.

It is an internationally accepted principle that ethics norms should be applied and enforced in research with humans through ethics review by research ethics committees (RECs). This places RECs at the very heart of the system for protecting participants and enforcing their rights. In the South African ethical-legal framework for child research, there are divergent approaches to consent. That is, section 71 of the National Health Act (No. 61 of 2003) (NHA) requires mandatory parental consent for child research, and limits the authority for proxy consent to parents and legal guardians.

However, national ethics guidelines authorised by section 72 of the NHA and issued by the National Health Research Ethics Council (NHREC) acting in terms of its mandate (National Department of Health, 2015) allow a more nuanced approach – i.e. self-consent by older adolescents, provided certain conditions are met, and consent by a range of parental substitutes where there are no available parents or legal guardians.

We have argued elsewhere that the consent approach in section 71 is inappropriately restrictive and are of the view that the consent approach endorsed in national ethics guidelines is more defensible. An REC that elects to approve a consent strategy allowable in ethics guidelines is effectively electing to not follow section 71, which raises the question of what the consequences might be for that REC. This article examines the legal liability of RECs through three ‘threads’ of accountability: the NHREC, the institutions hosting RECs, and the courts.

We conclude that: (i) if an REC approves a child protocol with consent strategies allowable in terms of national ethics guidelines but not in terms of section 71, it is unlikely that the NHREC would discipline the REC in the face of a complaint – provided the REC acted within national ethics guidelines issued by the NHREC in terms of the latter’s section 72 mandate to set national norms and standards; (ii) if an REC approves a consent approach allowed for in ethics guidance, it is also unlikely that the host institution would discipline the REC in the face of a complaint – especially if the institution is aware of the REC’s explicit decision to follow national ethics guidelines that are authorised by section 72 of the NHA; and (iii) an REC could only be sued by a participant in terms of the law of delict (and be liable for damages) if several demanding components are proven, such as that the harm suffered by the participant resulted directly from the REC’s actions in approving a particular consent strategy for that research.

Furthermore, the court may well look to national ethics guidelines in making determinations about whether an REC’s conduct was wrongful for the purposes of liability in civil law. RECs are protected from being collectively liable by insurance taken out by their host institutions. We make a series of recommendations to address this issue.

October 10, 2018
Year of publication
Resource types
Journal and research articles
research ethics, research ethics committees, ethics guidelines, adolescents, legal frameworks

Similar Resources

A key strategy of the South African national response to HIV is the scale-up of HIV counselling and testing (HCT) in the 15-49 years age group. The integrated school health policy aims to guide the roll out of youth-friendly health services including the provision of HCT in schools.

This issue of the Southern African HIV Clinicians Society's "HIV Nursing Matters" online magazine focuses on vulnerable populations, including TB in prisons and intimate partner violence in the context of HIV.

This issue of the Southern African HIV Clinicians Society's "HIV Nursing Matters" online magazine focuses on key populations.

Despite considerable efforts to scale up voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) for HIV prevention in priority countries over the last five years, implementation has faced important challenges. Seeking to enhance the effect of VMMC programs for greatest and most immediate impact, the U. S.…

DREAMS is an ambitious $385 million partnership to reduce HIV infections among adolescent girls and young women in 10 sub-Saharan African countries. The goal of DREAMS is to help girls develop into Determined, Resilient, Empowered, AIDS-free, Mentored, and Safe women.

Men’s gender role conflict and stress (GRC/S), the psychological strain they experience around fulfilling expectations of themselves as men, has been largely unexplored in HIV prevention research.

New strategies for HIV testing services (HTS) are needed to achieve UN 90-90-90 targets, including diagnosis of 90% of people living with HIV. Task-sharing HTS to trained lay providers may alleviate health worker shortages and better reach target groups.

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) that enables suppression of HIV replication has been successfully rolled out at large scale to HIV-positive patients in low-income and middle-income countries.

This article is featured in the SHARE Research Digest. Click here to learn more.

Clinical trials are more and more delocalized to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), either for reasons of external validity (to test new interventions in various epidemiological settings), or for convenience reasons (lower costs, easier review and easier availability of subjects), or for…